Who says rets can't grow on trees....

Post anything else

Moderator: Nod_Nod_Nod

Message
Author
User avatar
Lanac
Tyrant
Tyrant
Posts: 865
Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2010 4:18 pm
Location: Idk...

#16 Post by Lanac » Mon Oct 10, 2011 8:55 am

pmd wrote:u installed it from deb's?
Idk for Redman, but i downloaded from tremulous.net, enabled sllowed executing file as a program, runned it, installed, runned 1.2 gpp, enabled executing file as a program again, selected tremulous location folder, installed, made a shortcut, and voilla, both 1.1 and 1.2 works for me.
My Youtube Channel:
Please help my ass and click on link, im a poor bitch...(+ ill make some trem videos too :D)
http://adf.ly/2qaKp

User avatar
Redman
Marauder
Marauder
Posts: 403
Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2009 6:00 pm
Location: Walbrzych, Poland

#17 Post by Redman » Mon Oct 10, 2011 12:04 pm

I downloaded zip from tremulous.net.

Anyway the executable on tremulous.net is outdated and buggy. I tried to compile latest SVN revision but it had shitload of errors. When I fixed them and compilation finished the game was crashing at start.
Also known as the invisible man.

TheMuffinMann
Marauder
Marauder
Posts: 404
Joined: Fri Jul 16, 2010 12:14 am
Location: Germany

#18 Post by TheMuffinMann » Wed Oct 12, 2011 7:16 am

Maybe try contacting Itamar or Ams about this.. They're both quite skilled with Linux and might help you install Trem GPP on your machine.
A signature, for me?

Stop it, you. :$

User avatar
pmd
Server supporter
Server supporter
Posts: 268
Joined: Sun May 16, 2010 8:10 pm
Location: Novorossiysk city, Russian Federation

#19 Post by pmd » Sun Oct 30, 2011 2:40 pm

new ubuntu new problems.
i succesfully installed oficial trem 1.1 and gpp on my ubuntu 11.10.
new problem: i cant build tremfusion from sources.
teh error:

Code: Select all

LD build/release-linux-x86/base/uix86.so
cc: error: unrecognized option «--no-allow-shlib-undefined»
Quarko wrote: If you have time to think about crap - you are not working hard enough.

User avatar
Redman
Marauder
Marauder
Posts: 403
Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2009 6:00 pm
Location: Walbrzych, Poland

#20 Post by Redman » Sun Oct 30, 2011 3:24 pm

Remove --no-allow-shlib-undefined from makefile.

Ubuntu 11.10 is really weird. Synaptic was crashing all the time (the solution for the bug was to turn on then turn off screen reader, wtf?). I can't use sync settings in VLC because it crashes. Also the Unity user interface is shit, good thing it's possible to install old desktop.
Also known as the invisible man.

User avatar
pmd
Server supporter
Server supporter
Posts: 268
Joined: Sun May 16, 2010 8:10 pm
Location: Novorossiysk city, Russian Federation

#21 Post by pmd » Sun Oct 30, 2011 5:38 pm

Redman wrote:Remove --no-allow-shlib-undefined from makefile.

Ubuntu 11.10 is really weird. Synaptic was crashing all the time (the solution for the bug was to turn on then turn off screen reader, wtf?). I can't use sync settings in VLC because it crashes. Also the Unity user interface is shit, good thing it's possible to install old desktop.
without --no-allow-shlib-undefined will be more errors in code. what easier:
1) install fixed/modified gcc(i think its problem of gcc) or just use new parameters.
2) fix tremfusion errors
Quarko wrote: If you have time to think about crap - you are not working hard enough.

User avatar
Redman
Marauder
Marauder
Posts: 403
Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2009 6:00 pm
Location: Walbrzych, Poland

#22 Post by Redman » Sun Oct 30, 2011 6:15 pm

someone on stackoverflow wrote: --no-undefined
Report unresolved symbol references from regular object files.
This is done even if the linker is creating a non-symbolic shared
library. The switch --[no-]allow-shlib-undefined controls the
behaviour for reporting unresolved references found in shared
libraries being linked in.

--allow-shlib-undefined
--no-allow-shlib-undefined
Allows (the default) or disallows undefined symbols in shared
libraries. This switch is similar to --no-undefined except
that it determines the behaviour when the undefined symbols are
in a shared library rather than a regular object file. It does
not affect how undefined symbols in regular object files are
handled.

The reason that --allow-shlib-undefined is the default is that the
shared library being specified at link time may not be the
same as the one that is available at load time, so the symbols might
actually be resolvable at load time. Plus there are some systems,
(eg BeOS) where undefined symbols in shared libraries is normal.
(The kernel patches them at load time to select which function is most
appropriate for the current architecture. This is used for example to
dynamically select an appropriate memset function). Apparently it is
also normal for HPPA shared libraries to have undefined symbols.

User avatar
pmd
Server supporter
Server supporter
Posts: 268
Joined: Sun May 16, 2010 8:10 pm
Location: Novorossiysk city, Russian Federation

#23 Post by pmd » Thu Nov 10, 2011 5:44 pm

so, looks like new versions of gcc does not support commands:
--no-undefined
--allow-shlib-undefined
--no-allow-shlib-undefined
result of make without "--no-allow-shlib-undefined":

Code: Select all

LD build/release-linux-x86/base/uix86.so
/usr/lib/gcc/i686-linux-gnu/4.6.1/../../../i386-linux-gnu/crt1.o: In function `_start':
(.text+0x18): undefined reference to `main'
build/release-linux-x86/base/qcommon/q_math.o: In function `RotatePointAroundVector':
q_math.c:(.text+0x541): undefined reference to `sincosf'
build/release-linux-x86/base/qcommon/q_math.o: In function `RotateAroundDirection':
q_math.c:(.text+0xb01): undefined reference to `sincosf'
build/release-linux-x86/base/qcommon/q_math.o: In function `AngleVectors':
q_math.c:(.text+0x19da): undefined reference to `sincosf'
q_math.c:(.text+0x1a29): undefined reference to `sincosf'
q_math.c:(.text+0x1a79): undefined reference to `sincosf'
there is no any "sincosf" in q_math.c, or i dont see what code is refrenced to it.

any ideas?
Quarko wrote: If you have time to think about crap - you are not working hard enough.

User avatar
ani
Granger
Granger
Posts: 193
Joined: Sun Mar 07, 2010 11:49 am

#24 Post by ani » Thu Nov 10, 2011 5:58 pm

does anyone have an idea when the real 1.2 will be available ?
because people has quit 1.1 and i have shit errors with 1.2 too

User avatar
Redman
Marauder
Marauder
Posts: 403
Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2009 6:00 pm
Location: Walbrzych, Poland

#25 Post by Redman » Thu Nov 10, 2011 6:09 pm

1.2 client available on tremulous.net is really outdated. Try compiling latest svn version (http://svn.icculus.org/tremulous/), helped for me.

User avatar
ani
Granger
Granger
Posts: 193
Joined: Sun Mar 07, 2010 11:49 am

#26 Post by ani » Thu Nov 10, 2011 6:13 pm

i have ubuntu 11.04, so will i have
shitload of errors
like you ? >.<

User avatar
Redman
Marauder
Marauder
Posts: 403
Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2009 6:00 pm
Location: Walbrzych, Poland

#27 Post by Redman » Thu Nov 10, 2011 6:43 pm

The revision I tried before was shit. Now I'm using revision 2260 which works fine.
Last edited by Redman on Thu Nov 10, 2011 6:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
ani
Granger
Granger
Posts: 193
Joined: Sun Mar 07, 2010 11:49 am

#28 Post by ani » Thu Nov 10, 2011 6:48 pm

ok

User avatar
pmd
Server supporter
Server supporter
Posts: 268
Joined: Sun May 16, 2010 8:10 pm
Location: Novorossiysk city, Russian Federation

#29 Post by pmd » Thu Nov 10, 2011 7:46 pm

whats about alt+tab in official trem client?

upd: solved

Code: Select all

startx /usr/local/bin/tremulous-gpp -- &#58;1

in the console(not treminal emulator), for example i did it on console called by ctrl+alt+f6
Quarko wrote: If you have time to think about crap - you are not working hard enough.

User avatar
ani
Granger
Granger
Posts: 193
Joined: Sun Mar 07, 2010 11:49 am

#30 Post by ani » Fri Nov 11, 2011 8:28 am

svn is really obscure T.T

when i do:
svn checkout http://svn.icculus.org/tremulous/ /home/ani/svntremsource
It says:
svn: OPTIONS de 'http://svn.icculus.org/tremulous': 200 OK (http://svn.icculus.org)
but i get nothing in svntremsource folder :?

Post Reply