Page 2 of 2
Posted: Mon Jul 18, 2011 8:19 am
by Quarko
Omfg, wtf are those noobish "no rc jump" and "no om saw" rules? This just sounds crazy. I would only appreciate that rules in 1v1 game, otherwise - they are noobish crap.
Why not add "no tyrants" and "no bs" rules too? Or maybe "no turrets!"?
Posted: Mon Jul 18, 2011 9:12 am
by Castyo
Posted: Mon Jul 18, 2011 10:37 am
by grmg.pl
There are skilled ppl on both servers. "Random players" have more skil on us on average.
As for the PPNLs' video - skill is not measured by peak performance. Skill is measured by consistency.
Posted: Mon Jul 18, 2011 10:46 am
by Rotacak
Loki wrote:PPNL, I've played some cws with american people. We said that, no rc jumping no om saw but they did it. They had s2 we had s3 and they rc jumped. We've won contumately (idk if it's the right word) because they did this.
Yes, that is really proof
You should make rule "no join teams"...
Posted: Mon Jul 18, 2011 12:31 pm
by Quarko
grmg.pl wrote:As for the PPNLs' video - skill is not measured by peak performance. Skill is measured by consistency.
Nooo! Skill is measured by Aimbot's sensitivity level!
Posted: Mon Jul 18, 2011 1:04 pm
by grmg.pl
Quarko wrote:Nooo! Skill is measured by Aimbot's sensitivity level!
And they will appear if 1.2 gets more popular.
Posted: Mon Jul 18, 2011 4:06 pm
by Loki
RC Jump or omsaw doesn't show the real skill. This rule is in every cw, if you don't play cw, why should you care?
Btw ppnl, ppl want to see CW frags, not public
Posted: Mon Jul 18, 2011 4:43 pm
by pmd
Loki wrote:RC Jump or omsaw doesn't show the real skill. This rule is in every cw, if you don't play cw, why should you care?
Btw ppnl, ppl want to see CW frags, not public
always think that tremulous player skill is in tactis and strategy, not in shoothing to every move alien target. and rc hop or omsaw - is tactic - rush defenceless base
Posted: Mon Jul 18, 2011 5:56 pm
by Rotacak
Loki wrote:This rule is in every lame cw
Fixed.
Posted: Mon Jul 18, 2011 6:22 pm
by grmg.pl
1.RC Jump or omsaw doesn't show the real skill. 2.and rc hop or omsaw - is tactic - rush defenceless base
You obviously have no idea what rc hop is. That or you're a really shitty player.
So:
First, lol, is number 2.
2. The idea of Rc hop is to find a route through turrets with minimal damage, get on top rc, where rets have no coverage in bad built base, kill rc, kill rest of base.
There ARE defences and in most cases there ARE defenders (shitty ones help too, esp when some loser shoots rc).
Om sawing is the idea to rush a BUILT alien base WITH defences while avoiding acid and hives and aliens, find a spot where psaw canot be harmed by defenders and kill om.
Killing undefended rc or om is not rc hop/om psaw.
1. It DOES show skill when you hop rc through defended and built base. Any fucking noob can kill undefended and unbuilt base. Most good players focus on getting crucial structures. Rets don't count - like all defences they are ONLY to buy time to kill enemy base while hes killing yours.
Posted: Mon Jul 18, 2011 6:46 pm
by pmd
rofl
thanks,Sheldon!
fail at building turrets and fail at defend base against rc hop = undefended base
fail at building tubes and fail at defend base against a man with saw = undefended base
base can be built, contain some players(defenders/campers) and in same time it can be undefended
Posted: Mon Jul 18, 2011 10:17 pm
by grmg.pl
pmd wrote:fail at building turrets and fail at defend base against rc hop = undefended base
Would they FAIL to defend it against unskilled player?
Posted: Tue Jul 19, 2011 8:19 am
by Loki
grmg, ye we usually build anti-rc or anti-omsaw base
Rotacak wrote:Loki wrote:This rule is in every lame cw
Fixed.
Thanks
