How many horses can you see.

Message

==Troy== · #1 Post by **==Troy==** » Wed Nov 07, 2007 10:58 pm

if you look at it the RIGHT way round :

#2 Post by **Rotacak** » Thu Nov 08, 2007 12:10 am

5

Nice, this is firsttime when I see stereogram in 3D.

_MaC_ · #3 Post by **_MaC_** » Thu Nov 08, 2007 10:05 pm

really nice, never seen a stero like this

HellreapeR · #4 Post by **HellreapeR** » Fri Nov 09, 2007 10:13 am

I can't see the full picture, but ye there are 5 horsies.

Nice image btw.

==Troy== · #5 Post by **==Troy==** » Fri Nov 09, 2007 10:16 am

HellreapeR wrote:I can't see the full picture

HellreapeR · #6 Post by **HellreapeR** » Fri Nov 09, 2007 4:07 pm

I cant see the last horse on the right side... only the shadow.

_MaC_ · #7 Post by **_MaC_** » Fri Nov 09, 2007 5:16 pm

HellreapeR wrote:I cant see the last horse on the right side... only the shadow.

it's a stereogram, like this
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Ster ... _Shark.png

apparently it's bounce of random lines colored, but to see the 3d image hidden, u have to cross a little your eyes and try to focus more deeper.
on the image posted by troy, u will see a 3d chessboard, try it! it's really nice.

==Troy== · #8 Post by **==Troy==** » Fri Nov 09, 2007 6:48 pm

Mac. you do not have to cross your eye. On contrary you have to "un-cross" them, as if you are looking at something PAST your monitor, and not in front of it. Otherwise the image will be screwed.

_MaC_ · #9 Post by **_MaC_** » Sat Nov 10, 2007 4:55 am

no no Troy, eyes are a little crossed, to see stereograms.

==Troy== · #10 Post by **==Troy==** » Sat Nov 10, 2007 6:24 am

lol.... the wiki you sent. read a little bit in there, it explains everything )

_MaC_ · #11 Post by **_MaC_** » Sat Nov 10, 2007 3:40 pm

"According to Magic Eye, a maker of autostereograms, "most people prefer the diverging method". However, with normal stereograms, this imposes a limit on the size of the image, since there is a limit to how much the eyes diverge; images created for the cross-eyed method can be larger. If a stereogram is viewed with the wrong method, the depth information is seen 'backwards'; points intended to be in the background appear in the foreground and vice versa."

i know what i do with my eyes, i cross them a bit and focus.

==Troy== · #12 Post by **==Troy==** » Sat Nov 10, 2007 4:15 pm

hmm... if it is a "bit" then it is right, if it is a "lot" then it is wrong

) I just didnt get the exact value of "crossing" you meant. So yes, its ok.

If anyone interested, NASA has a lot of stereo images avialable both for cross and un-cross types of viewing the image