Page 1 of 1

How many horses can you see.

Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2007 10:58 pm
by ==Troy==
if you look at it the RIGHT way round :

Image

Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2007 12:10 am
by Rotacak
5 :-)
Nice, this is firsttime when I see stereogram in 3D.

Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2007 10:05 pm
by _MaC_
really nice, never seen a stero like this :o

Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2007 10:13 am
by HellreapeR
I can't see the full picture, but ye there are 5 horsies. :D
Nice image btw.

Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2007 10:16 am
by ==Troy==
HellreapeR wrote:I can't see the full picture
:?: :?: :?:

Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2007 4:07 pm
by HellreapeR
I cant see the last horse on the right side... only the shadow.

Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2007 5:16 pm
by _MaC_
HellreapeR wrote:I cant see the last horse on the right side... only the shadow.
it's a stereogram, like this
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Ster ... _Shark.png

apparently it's bounce of random lines colored, but to see the 3d image hidden, u have to cross a little your eyes and try to focus more deeper.
on the image posted by troy, u will see a 3d chessboard, try it! it's really nice.

Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2007 6:48 pm
by ==Troy==
Mac. you do not have to cross your eye. On contrary you have to "un-cross" them, as if you are looking at something PAST your monitor, and not in front of it. Otherwise the image will be screwed.

Posted: Sat Nov 10, 2007 4:55 am
by _MaC_
no no Troy, eyes are a little crossed, to see stereograms.

Posted: Sat Nov 10, 2007 6:24 am
by ==Troy==
lol.... the wiki you sent. read a little bit in there, it explains everything )

Posted: Sat Nov 10, 2007 3:40 pm
by _MaC_
"According to Magic Eye, a maker of autostereograms, "most people prefer the diverging method". However, with normal stereograms, this imposes a limit on the size of the image, since there is a limit to how much the eyes diverge; images created for the cross-eyed method can be larger. If a stereogram is viewed with the wrong method, the depth information is seen 'backwards'; points intended to be in the background appear in the foreground and vice versa."

i know what i do with my eyes, i cross them a bit and focus. :wink:

Posted: Sat Nov 10, 2007 4:15 pm
by ==Troy==
hmm... if it is a "bit" then it is right, if it is a "lot" then it is wrong :)) I just didnt get the exact value of "crossing" you meant. So yes, its ok.

If anyone interested, NASA has a lot of stereo images avialable both for cross and un-cross types of viewing the image :)