PPNL's Massdriver Montage

Message

Quarko · #16 Post by **Quarko** » Mon Jul 18, 2011 8:19 am

Omfg, wtf are those noobish "no rc jump" and "no om saw" rules? This just sounds crazy. I would only appreciate that rules in 1v1 game, otherwise - they are noobish crap.

Why not add "no tyrants" and "no bs" rules too? Or maybe "no turrets!"?

Castyo · #17 Post by **Castyo** » Mon Jul 18, 2011 9:12 am

No egg and no node!

grmg.pl · #18 Post by **grmg.pl** » Mon Jul 18, 2011 10:37 am

There are skilled ppl on both servers. "Random players" have more skil on us on average.

As for the PPNLs' video - skill is not measured by peak performance. Skill is measured by consistency.

#19 Post by **Rotacak** » Mon Jul 18, 2011 10:46 am

Loki wrote:PPNL, I've played some cws with american people. We said that, no rc jumping no om saw but they did it. They had s2 we had s3 and they rc jumped. We've won contumately (idk if it's the right word) because they did this.

Yes, that is really proof

You should make rule "no join teams"...

Quarko · #20 Post by **Quarko** » Mon Jul 18, 2011 12:31 pm

grmg.pl wrote:As for the PPNLs' video - skill is not measured by peak performance. Skill is measured by consistency.

Nooo! Skill is measured by Aimbot's sensitivity level!

grmg.pl · #21 Post by **grmg.pl** » Mon Jul 18, 2011 1:04 pm

Quarko wrote:Nooo! Skill is measured by Aimbot's sensitivity level!

And they will appear if 1.2 gets more popular.

Loki · #22 Post by **Loki** » Mon Jul 18, 2011 4:06 pm

RC Jump or omsaw doesn't show the real skill. This rule is in every cw, if you don't play cw, why should you care?
Btw ppnl, ppl want to see CW frags, not public

pmd · #23 Post by **pmd** » Mon Jul 18, 2011 4:43 pm

Loki wrote:RC Jump or omsaw doesn't show the real skill. This rule is in every cw, if you don't play cw, why should you care?
Btw ppnl, ppl want to see CW frags, not public

always think that tremulous player skill is in tactis and strategy, not in shoothing to every move alien target. and rc hop or omsaw - is tactic - rush defenceless base

#24 Post by **Rotacak** » Mon Jul 18, 2011 5:56 pm

Loki wrote:This rule is in every lame cw

Fixed.

grmg.pl · #25 Post by **grmg.pl** » Mon Jul 18, 2011 6:22 pm

1.RC Jump or omsaw doesn't show the real skill. 2.and rc hop or omsaw - is tactic - rush defenceless base

You obviously have no idea what rc hop is. That or you're a really shitty player.

So:

First, lol, is number 2.

2. The idea of Rc hop is to find a route through turrets with minimal damage, get on top rc, where rets have no coverage in bad built base, kill rc, kill rest of base.

There ARE defences and in most cases there ARE defenders (shitty ones help too, esp when some loser shoots rc).

Om sawing is the idea to rush a BUILT alien base WITH defences while avoiding acid and hives and aliens, find a spot where psaw canot be harmed by defenders and kill om.

Killing undefended rc or om is not rc hop/om psaw.

1. It DOES show skill when you hop rc through defended and built base. Any fucking noob can kill undefended and unbuilt base. Most good players focus on getting crucial structures. Rets don't count - like all defences they are ONLY to buy time to kill enemy base while hes killing yours.

pmd · #26 Post by **pmd** » Mon Jul 18, 2011 6:46 pm

rofl
thanks,Sheldon!

fail at building turrets and fail at defend base against rc hop = undefended base
fail at building tubes and fail at defend base against a man with saw = undefended base

base can be built, contain some players(defenders/campers) and in same time it can be undefended

grmg.pl · #27 Post by **grmg.pl** » Mon Jul 18, 2011 10:17 pm

pmd wrote:fail at building turrets and fail at defend base against rc hop = undefended base

Would they FAIL to defend it against unskilled player?

Loki · #28 Post by **Loki** » Tue Jul 19, 2011 8:19 am

grmg, ye we usually build anti-rc or anti-omsaw base

Rotacak wrote:
Loki wrote:This rule is in every lame cw
Fixed.

Thanks